Which is better: a native speaking teacher or a non-native teacher?

What even is a native speaker?

First a little background. What is a native speaker when English is now considered an international lingua franca?

English is the largest language by number of speakers, and the third most-spoken native language in the world. As of 2016, 400 million people spoke English as their first language, and 1.1 billion spoke it as a secondary language. It is the most widely learned second language and is either the official language or one of the official languages in almost 60 nations. There are more people who have learned it as a second language than there are native speakers. Linguist David Crystal estimates that non-native speakers now outnumber native speakers by a ratio of 3 to 1.

English is a pluricentric language, which means that no one authority sets the standard for use of the language. The norms of standard written English are maintained purely by the consensus of educated English-speakers around the world, without any oversight by any government or international organization. Modern English, sometimes described as the first global lingua franca, is also regarded as the first “world language”. English is the world's most widely used language in newspaper publishing, book publishing, international telecommunications, scientific publishing, international trade, mass entertainment, and diplomacy. English is a co-official language of the United Nations, the European Union and many other world and regional international organizations. Non-native varieties of English are widely used for international communication, and speakers of one such variety often encounter features of other varieties. Very often today a conversation in English anywhere in the world may include no native speakers of English at all, even while including speakers from several different countries. Academics argue that even using the term “native speaker” is irrelevant in the age of international English and reinforces imperialist and racist beliefs. English these days does not belong to the native speakers, but rather to all those who use it.

The native teacher fallacy

There are several fallacies about the assumed superiority of native speaking teachers that have been widely studied and debunked.

1) Student’s prefer native teachers.

Studies have consistently shown that both Native Speakers (NS) and Non-Native Speakers (NNS) have perceived strengths and weaknesses when it comes to English language teaching. The majority of students say there is no clear overwhelming advantage to a NS teacher. For example, research has shown that while NS are seen to have better vocabulary and pronunciation, students perceive NNS as having a better understanding of how English grammar works. NNS are also perceived to be better role models in the learning of English and as more familiar with the needs language learners. Similarly, studies show that accent had no impact on student success in learning a language. Finally, most students are learning English in order to communicate as a lingua franca, therefore they are not trying to achieve native speaker level. There is a slight agreement that NS may be more suited to higher-level students, and NNS to lower ones, but the consensus was clearly that both “types” of teacher are as good as each other. These findings suggest that each group has its benefits and has something unique to offer in the ESL classroom.

2) Native Speakers are better because they know the culture.

a) NS don’t necessarily know “English culture”. They often know regional, local culture only.

b) English culture is not homogenous, as English is now a global language. Plus, no teacher could have familiarity with all the different English speaking cultures that exist.

c) And finally, do students really need to learn English culture if it is to be used as a lingua franca? And which English culture (American, British, Irish, Australian…) is the right one for them to learn?

3) Native speakers are more proficient and therefore better teachers.

a) It is not true that all NS know more vocabulary than NNS–the language is vast and varied.

b) It is not true that all NS are at C2 level. Imagine in your own native language the various native language abilities that exist.

c) It is not true that NS are better models of pronunciation. There is no objective reason why one pronunciation is better than another—foreign accents are ok! Also, some English dialects are notoriously hard to understand. So, just because a teacher is a NS does not mean their English is “standard”.

d) Proficiency doesn’t make you a good teacher. The truth is many schools hire unqualified NS teachers simply for the image it gives their company. English teachers are made not born.

e) Some often sited disadvantages of a NS teacher are:

i) Native speakerism has implications in pedagogy by creating an unattainable ideal. Students feel like they can never obtain the max native speaker level.

ii) Studies have shown that NS may not correct students as much as NNS, letting errors slip by.

iii) NS are often not as aware of English rules and structures as a second language learners (aks. Non-native teachers).

iv) A native teacher might not always use the most correct forms of the language, but rather a certain dialect or informal style. Also NS are not necessarily good at teaching multiple dialects of English, but rather just teach their own.

v) Not all NS are passionate about teaching English, it’s a lucrative job. They often have less enthusiasm for the language than a NNS.

f) Some advantages of a NNS teacher are:

i) High language awareness and passion for the language.

ii) Sensitive to the learner’s culture, needs, and first language.

iii) Are a role model as a second language learner themselves.

iv) Know cultural differences between the mother tongue and the second language.

v) Are more empathetic to learner’s experience because they’ve been there.

vi) Are a model of a successful English learner, thus source of motivation.

vii) Are aware of learning strategies because of their language learning experience.

viii) Can understand translation mistakes.

ix) Can explain in native language.

So it really doesn’t matter whether I have a native speaking teacher or not?

Obviously when we advocate for hiring NNS teachers we are talking about teachers that are highly qualified with high pedogeological knowledge, have experience, and have very high language knowledge.

When looking for an English teacher, you might consider what your objective is. A NNS is good for the majority of language learners. Specifically, if you have a relatively low level of English or if you use English to communicate internationally as a lingua franca, a NNS teacher might even be preferred! A NS might be good if you need a very, very high level of English, if you need to have a specific accent (in this case you might look for an accent coaching specialist), or if you need English for a very specific purpose like a niche profession. Also, consider working with both! Studies have shown that NS and NNS complement each other with different skills providing a well rounded experience in your English learning!

And remember, the most important factor to learning a language is not your teacher, but YOU. We learn a language by learning it; that is, by putting in the effort and time to sit down and actively engage with it. An inspiring teacher is great, whether that’s a native or non-native, but you will learn English from any teacher if you put in the work. You can learn English alone if you want to—and many people do.

Discrimination in hiring exists

There is now 20 years of research about discriminatory hiring practices in English language teaching. However these practices continue to exist despite TESOL—the largest professional organization for teachers of English as a second or foreign language—banning the term, and that fact that in the EU it is illegal to advertise jobs only for native speakers under non-discrimination law. The preference for hiring native English-speaking teachers is at best a discriminatory practice and at worst racist.

Native speakerism—the belief that a “native speaker” embodies the English language and Western culture—creates an exclusive, unattainable ideal where only a certain group are the real and true owners of the language and everyone else is less than. This is not only a false presumption in a world where English is the international lingua franca, but it is harmful to the teaching profession and disregards evidence that native teachers do not necessarily bring about superior language learning.

At La Miss de Inglés we hire both native and non-native teachers. Our non-native teachers are fluent English speakers who meet our internal evaluations for English proficiency. Our goal is to hire teachers that are highly qualified and that match the diverse learning needs of our students. We commonly pair lower level students (B1 or below) with our fluent, non-native teachers and our native teachers with higher level (B2 and above) students and achieve excellent learning outcomes with this strategy.

To learn more on native vs non-native teachers, we recommend the following sources:





Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

© 2020 by La Miss de Inglés

55 45062781


242 Tabasco, Roma Norte, CDMX 06700

Mexico City, Mexico

  • Facebook - Black Circle
  • Twitter - Black Circle
  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • LinkedIn - Black Circle